Tuesday, May 4, 2021

WHO NEEDS THE CHURCH?

That question was asked by some believers in Corinth, and the apostle Paul answered them in the 5th chapter of 1 Corinthians. While his response covers the whole chapter,  verses 14-17 could especially be written to the Church today and be just as relevant.  

“I do not write these things to shame you, but to admonish you as my beloved children. For if you were to have countless tutors in Christ, yet you would not have many fathers, for in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel. Therefore, I exhort you, be imitators of me.” (NASB) 

Never has the Church had more access to teachers than it does today. And, like the Corinthians, many believers seem to think relationships with spiritual “fathers” are not all that important. Church hopping and skipping have replaced faithful investment in the Church. Covid hasn’t helped, but we all know the trend has been increasing for some time. The song title “I Did It My Way” reflects many people’s approach to following Christ. We would do well to realize that the Proverbs that warn about following the ways that “seem right to a man” (16:25, 14:12) speak to believers and not just to those who reject the gospel outright. 

 

We know that mature spiritual formation only develops in committed relationships because that is where character and faith are tested and learned. (Ephesians 4:11-16) 

The passion to be free of Church commitments and spiritually-based relationships in many ways parallels the passion of youth to move out of the house and away from the constraints of parental authority. But like youths moving out, believers who depart from the Church eventually discover their “freedom” is also costly in many ways. 

If we prayerfully revisit passages of Scripture like this one perhaps we can help some people renew or develop a new relationship with the Church that will not only be to their benefit, but also to reaching people who do not know the Lord with the welcoming love and grace that a healthy church shares with the world. (John 17) 

Wednesday, January 27, 2021

What kind of extremist are you?

A couple quotes worth sharing and contemplating:

Amy Peikoff01/18/2021@AmyPeikoff 

"But though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter, I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love ... Was not Amos an extremist for justice: 'Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.' ... And John Bunyan: 'I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a butchery of my conscience.' And Abraham Lincoln: 'This nation cannot survive half slave and half free.' And Thomas Jefferson: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....' So, the question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love? Will we be extremists for preservation of injustice or for the extension of justice? In that dramatic scene on Calvary's hill three men...were [all] crucified for the same crime--the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thus fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth, and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment. Perhaps the South, the nation, and the world are in dire need of creative extremists." 

-- Martin Luther King, Jr., "Letter from Birmingham Jail" 
 

Might this be the year that all of us, regardless of political belief, become extremists for freedom of expression and privacy? Wouldn’t that turn 2021 on its head? 

 

John Maxwell once said, “A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way.”  

Monday, November 18, 2019

JOYFUL ABOUT GROWING?!?!?!?!?!

JOYFUL ABOUT GROWING?!?!?!

It's one thing to read Scripture as kind of a background to our lives about things we believe to be true. It is quite another to put our face in the mirror of Scripture every day and in every new situation we face to be sure we are thinking and acting the way God wants to enable us to do.
The beginning verses of James pose a real challenge to us when life isn't all going the way we wanted or expected it to go. Much of Scripture is paradoxical to our natural way of thinking and responding to life. That's why we need to be looking into it all the time. We are sinners (mistake-makers) by nature, but God has given us a new nature, and a handbook by which to see ourselves and receive guidance in the ways we should be allowing this new nature to operate through us. 
So, whatever feels like a trial to you right now, why not get happy about how it can be an experience that produces growth in faith and endurance in you?!?!?!?! Even thank God for it!!!!!!!!

James 1 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

James, a bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,
To the twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad: Greetings.
Consider it all joy, my brethren, when you encounter various trials, knowing that the testing of your faith produces endurance. And let endurance have its perfect result, so that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

In Donald Trump, Christians now have a powerful (if unlikely) champion in the White House


This is obviously not my blog, but an editorial of great interest and well worth reading for Christians in the context of our current political and spiritual climate. The credentials of the editor at the bottom are also of notable interest.

Donald Trump – expected to attend Thursday’s National Prayer Breakfast – is
clearly not your archetypal Christian. Yet after years of feeling marginalized, millions of America’s faithful are optimistic his presidency signals a renaissance of renewed respect and influence for Christianity in U.S. governance and culture.
They have a right to expect it. Strong majorities of them defeated the Democrats and put Trump into the Oval Office – Protestants (58%), white and Hispanic Catholics (52%), Evangelicals (81%), and even Mormons (61%). Hillary Clinton was strongly backed by non-religious Americans: “nones” (the religiously unaffiliated, 68%); people who never attend services (62%); and atheists and agnostics (61%).
Trump was enthusiastically endorsed by a broad spectrum of Christian leaders, as evidenced in the inauguration ceremony. Clinton was roundly championed by worldly celebrities.
The striking contrasts not only help explain why Trump won; going forward, they hold great promise for Christians beyond politics. Brooke Barnes, reporter for The New York Times, noted recently, “Ultraliberal movie executives, shocked to see a celebrity-encircled Hillary Clinton lose the presidential election to Donald J. Trump, have realized the degree to which they are out of touch with a vast pool of Americans.” Perhaps now the clueless execs will engage more attentively and knowledgeably with Christian audiences and filmmakers.
There’s also reason to hope the great awakening will open the eyes and minds of iconic reportorial corporations on both coasts; it’s sorely needed. The New York Times’ executive editor Dean Baquet himself recently confessed: “I think that the New York-based and Washington-based … media powerhouses don’t quite get religion. We have a fabulous religion writer, but she’s all alone. We don’t get religion. We don’t get the role of religion in people’s lives.”
At the very least, Christians now have a powerful, if unlikely, champion in the White House – a welcome departure from the past eight years. Michael Wear, a former Obama White House staffer, says, “there’s a religious illiteracy problem in the Democratic Party.” Wear recalls a fellow staffer questioning the title of a fact sheet titled Economic Fairness and the Least of These. The staffer didn’t get the meaning of “least of these,” a well-known Biblical phrase. “Is this a typo?” he reportedly queried. “It doesn’t make any sense to me. Who/what are ‘these’?”
Historians will surely debate why Christians selected Trump over candidates more overtly religious than he, such as Ted Cruz. But it’s evident they – like Jesus selecting his disciples – looked past Trump's glaring defects and saw a faithful ally.
As a Christian, I too expect he will make good on his promise to respect and protect religion in America, and not just Christianity. He’s an improbable, imperfect Defender of the Faith, to be sure, but I believe a sincere one.
Michael Guillen was born in East Los Angeles, earned his B.S. from UCLA and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Cornell University in physics, mathematics and astronomy. For eight years he was an award-winning physics instructor at Harvard University. For fourteen years he was the Emmy-award-winning science correspondent for ABC News, appearing regularly on "Good Morning America," "20/20," "Nightline," and "World News Tonight." Dr. Guillen is the host of the History Channel series, "Where Did It Come From?" and producer of the award-winning family movie, "LITTLE RED WAGON." His latest best-selling book, Amazing Truths: How Science and the Bible Agree, is published by HarperCollins. For more information, visit his website: www.michaelguillen.com.

Monday, January 30, 2017

What's In a Handshake? --more than you would think!

This is a very good example of what non-Muslim cultures throughout the world are now facing. We here in America had better pay close attention. It was passed to me, and I am passing it on to you.
  
  
What’s in a handshake? 
  
Sometimes it's the little things that are most telling. In 
Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the 
hands of their teachers at the beginning and end of the school 
day. It's a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher 
and pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom 
atmosphere. Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt 
compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of 
Swiss culture and daily life. 
  
And the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the 
handshake is that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who 
have lived in Switzerland for several years (and thus are familiar 
with its mores), in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to 
shake the hands of their teacher, a woman, because, they 
claimed, this would violate Muslim teachings that contact with 
the opposite sex is allowed only with family members. At first 
the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially 
granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of 
any female teacher. But an uproar followed, as Mayor Reto 
Wolf explained to the BBC: "the community was unhappy with 
the decision taken by the school. In our culture and in our way of 
communication a handshake is normal and sends out respect 
for the other person, and this has to be brought [home] to the 
children in school." 
  
Therwil's Educational Department reversed the school's 
decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the 
school's exemption was lifted because "the public interest with 
respect to equality between men and women and the integration 
of foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion." It 
added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake. 
Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again "the 
sanctions called for by law will be applied," which included a 
possible fine of up to 5,000 dollars. 
  
This uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at 
the original exemption granted to the Muslim boys, did not end 
after that exemption was itself overturned by the local 
Educational Department. The Swiss understood quite clearly that 
this was more than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a 
fight over whether the Swiss would be masters in their own 
house, or whether they would be forced to yield, by the granting 
of special treatment, to the Islamic view of the proper relations 
between the sexes. It is one battle – small but to the Swiss 
significant – between o'erweening Muslim immigrants and the 
indigenous Swiss. 
  
Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn, all hell broke 
loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic Central 
Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the Swiss 
decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticized the ruling 
in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the 
handshaking is "totalitarian" (!) because its intent is to "forbid  
religious people from meeting their obligations to God." That, of  
course, was never the "intent" of the long-standing handshaking 
custom, which was a nearly-universal custom in Switzerland, and 
in schools had to do only with encouraging the right classroom 
atmosphere of mutual respect between instructor and pupil, of 
which the handshake was one aspect. 
  
The Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing 
claims — will be familiar to Americans versed in Constitutional 
adjudication. In this case "the public interest with respect to 
equality" of the sexes and the "integration of foreigners" (who 
are expected to adopt Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt 
them from some of those ways) were weighed against the 
"religious obligations to God" of Muslims, and the former 
interests found to outweigh the latter. 
  
What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly 
inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and  
customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to 
settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little 
victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly 
integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that 
society to meet Muslim requirements. 
  
The handshake has been upheld and, what's more, a stiff fine 
now will be imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake 
hands with a female teacher. This is a heartening sign of 
non-surrender by the Swiss. 
  
The Swiss handshaking dispute has received some, but not 
enough, press attention. Presumably, it's deemed too 
inconsequential a matter to bother with. But the Swiss know 
better. And so should we. 
  
There's an old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: 
"Many a little makes a mickle." That is, the accumulation of 
many little things leads to one big thing. That's what's happening 
in Europe today. This was one victory for the side of sanity. 
There will need to be a great many more.